![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Aug. 24th, 2008 10:40 pmПочитал авиационный форум российский, про Мадридскую катастрофу
... и немного офигел ....
оказалось, что мадридский техник не смог найти причину того, что у пилота горит красная лампочка запрещающая взлет (температурный датчик). В результате, техник просто отлючил эту лампочку и пилоту сказали взлетать.
Но самое интересное не это
Самое интересное, что такое поведение техника и руководства аэропорта - вполне укладываетсяч в официальные инструкции
In a massively heavily attended press conference in Madrid, the Management of Scandinavian Airlines (SAS), to which Spanair belongs, has justified the take-off of the crashed airplane. Nevertheless, they admitted that the airplane had a problem with “over-heating in an air-intake valve”, which was “cut-off” and then the airplane “was sent on its way”.
Faced with the question of whether cutting off the problem means fixing it, the assistant general manager and production manager of Spanair, Javier Mendoza, maintained that there are different ways of dealing with this problem and on this occasion “the system was cut off by turning off the switch which gives it power.”
Mendoza stated that “this is an acceptable flight condition and is normal industry procedure. There is a document which is a list of minimum equipment requirements which supports this action”. Therefore, according to these explanations, the breakdown was not completely repaired, it was “cut off”.
... и немного офигел ....
оказалось, что мадридский техник не смог найти причину того, что у пилота горит красная лампочка запрещающая взлет (температурный датчик). В результате, техник просто отлючил эту лампочку и пилоту сказали взлетать.
Но самое интересное не это
Самое интересное, что такое поведение техника и руководства аэропорта - вполне укладываетсяч в официальные инструкции
In a massively heavily attended press conference in Madrid, the Management of Scandinavian Airlines (SAS), to which Spanair belongs, has justified the take-off of the crashed airplane. Nevertheless, they admitted that the airplane had a problem with “over-heating in an air-intake valve”, which was “cut-off” and then the airplane “was sent on its way”.
Faced with the question of whether cutting off the problem means fixing it, the assistant general manager and production manager of Spanair, Javier Mendoza, maintained that there are different ways of dealing with this problem and on this occasion “the system was cut off by turning off the switch which gives it power.”
Mendoza stated that “this is an acceptable flight condition and is normal industry procedure. There is a document which is a list of minimum equipment requirements which supports this action”. Therefore, according to these explanations, the breakdown was not completely repaired, it was “cut off”.
